<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: He&#8217;d been known to escape houses through the keyhole</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.appalachianhistory.net/2011/10/hed-been-known-to-escape-houses-through.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.appalachianhistory.net/2011/10/hed-been-known-to-escape-houses-through.html</link>
	<description>Stories, quotes and anecdotes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:31:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: particle_person</title>
		<link>http://www.appalachianhistory.net/2011/10/hed-been-known-to-escape-houses-through.html#comment-419405</link>
		<dc:creator>particle_person</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 23:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appalachianhistory.net/2008/10/hed-been-known-to-escape-houses-through-the-keyhole/#comment-419405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s more to the story — Stout indicted persons responsible for his arrest:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Stout, on the other hand, went before the grand jury and indicted a number of persons concerned in his arrest, for assault and battery. When these cases came on to be heard before Judge Caruthers and a jury of the county, the defendants admitted the assault and battery and justified on the ground that it was committed in arresting a felon, relying on the statutes of Henry VIII. and James I., making witchcraft a felony, which they declared had never been repealed in this State. The enlightened Judge, however, charged the jury that they were &quot;destructive of, repugnant to, or inconsistent with the freedom and independence of this State, and form of government,&quot; and were never in force here by virtue of the act of 1778, and the defendants were accordingly convicted.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From the same source as the above.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s more to the story — Stout indicted persons responsible for his arrest:</p>
<blockquote><p>Stout, on the other hand, went before the grand jury and indicted a number of persons concerned in his arrest, for assault and battery. When these cases came on to be heard before Judge Caruthers and a jury of the county, the defendants admitted the assault and battery and justified on the ground that it was committed in arresting a felon, relying on the statutes of Henry VIII. and James I., making witchcraft a felony, which they declared had never been repealed in this State. The enlightened Judge, however, charged the jury that they were &#8220;destructive of, repugnant to, or inconsistent with the freedom and independence of this State, and form of government,&#8221; and were never in force here by virtue of the act of 1778, and the defendants were accordingly convicted.</p></blockquote>
<p>(From the same source as the above.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
